|
Media summary | Art Krush | NY Review of Books
Media coverage before the December 2001 conference:
For Lawrence
Weschler's original Jan. 2000 New Yorker piece on Hockney's "evolving
theory", click
here.
For Weschler's follow-up piece on more recent developments in Hockney and
Falco's collaboration, see www.artkrush.com
Media coverage after the December 2001 conference:
"Smackdown!" - Artkrush's coverage of the conference, December 3 2001
USA
Today - "'Secret Knowledge' hits art world's optic nerve" - December 6th 2001 [Books], by Tara McKelvey
New
York Times - "The Truth Is Out: How Realists Could Be So Realistic" - Novemebr 25th 2001, by Richard Woodward
New
York Times - "Paintings Too Perfect? The Great Optics Debate" - December 4th 2001, by Sarah Boxer
LA
Times - "There's Nothing Wrong With Artists Using Tricks of the Trade" - December 11th, 2001 [style], by Christopher Knight
LA
Times - "Artistic Fact or Optical Delusion? Culture: David Hockney claims many famous paintings were traced using camera-like devices" - December 3rd, 2001, by Paul Lieberman
LA
Times - "Cover Review; Did the Old Masters Cheat?; SECRET KNOWLEDGE Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters, By David Hockney" - December 9, 2001 [Review of Books], by Frederic Raphael
The New York
Review of Books - "Through a Glass, Darkly" - February 28, 2002, By Ingrid D. Rowland
The Washington Post - "SECRET KNOWLEDGE Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters" By David Hockney - Febuary 3, 2002 [Art], by Blake Gopnik
< Previous Next >
|