Relevant paintings: "Homeless and Hungry," Fildes [Enlarge]
|
[Letterhead Goupil & Cie., Paris. Letter from Theo to
Vincent.]
[Vincent's handwriting] Please don't think I'm sending your
letter back to offend you, I simply believe this is the
quickest way of answering it clearly. And if you didn't have
your own letter to hand, you might not be able to understand
quite so well what my answer refers to. Now the numbers will
guide you. I'm short of time, I'm still expecting a model
today.
[Theo's handwriting]
Paris, 5 January 1882
My dear Vincent,
I have received your two letters and thank you for keeping
me in the picture. I think it is a very good thing that you
have settled permanently in The Hague and hope to do as much as
I can to help you out until you can start earning your own
money. But what I do not approve of is the way in which you
contrived to leave Father and Mother, (1)
That you could not bear it there is possible and that you
should differ in your views from people who have lived in the
country all their lives and who have had no chance of
participating in modern life, is only too natural, but what the
devil made you so childish and so shameless as to embitter
Father and Father's life and render it almost impossible by
setting about things in the way you did? (2) It isn't hard to
fight with someone who is already weary. (3)
When Father wrote to me about it, I thought it must be a
misunderstanding, but you yourself say in your letter,
“As far as the relationship between Father and me is
concerned, it will not be remedied in a hurry.” (4) Don't
you know him then, and don't you realize that Father cannot
live while there is all this bickering between the two of you?
(5) Coûte que coûte [at all costs], you are in
duty bound to ensure that matters are put right and I
guarantee that one day you will be extremely sorry for having
been so callous in this matter. (6)
It is Mauve who attracts you at the moment, and, carried
away as usual, you find anyone who is not like him
objectionable, because you look for the same qualities in
everybody. (7) Is it not a bitter pill for Father to swallow to
see himself belittled by someone who claims to be more of a
freethinker, (8) and whom, au fond [deep down], he possibly
envies from time to time for his clearer insights? (9) Does his
life count for nothing then? (10) I don't understand you. (11)
Write to me again when you can (12) and give my regards to
Mauve and Jet.
Ever yours, Theo
[Vincent's handwriting]
7 or 8 January 1882
Because I have only a little time to spare, I can think of
no better means of replying to your letter than by doing it in
this way, answering your points one by one in orderly
sequence.
-
I did not `contrive' anything, on the contrary, when
Father was here, Mauve, Father and I talked about my
renting a studio in Etten - spending the winter there - and
returning to The Hague in the spring. Because of the models
and because I had settled down to my work in Etten and had
begun to make headway.
That does not alter the fact that I should have liked to
prolong my stay in The Hague a bit more, seeing that I was here
already, but it was nevertheless my definite intention to
continue my studies of the Brabant peasant types. And when my
plans were thwarted, after they had been discussed with M. and
I had already entered into correspondence with him about the
studio in question (a shed in need of some repair), I could no
longer contain my anger.
Do you recall a letter I wrote to you in which I expanded at
some length on my plan to continue those studies? I mean the
letter in which I asked you to impress upon Father and Mother
once more in plain terms that working in Etten was of the
greatest importance to me, etc. I remember the way I put it: it
would be too bad if, because of a whim of Father's, I had to
abandon work that had begun to make headway and on which I had
been engaged for months. Give it some thought yourself -
despite Mauve's help I am in much more of a fix here than at
home, and I'll be blowed if I know how I am going to get
through it.
-
The reproach that I set about embittering Father's and
Mother's life is not really your own. I know it, and of
old, as one of Father's Jesuitisms and have told Father,
and Mother too, that I considered it to be a Jesuitism and
that I didn't take the slightest notice of it.
Whenever one says something to Father to which he has no
reply, he comes out with a reproach of that sort and says, for
example, “You will be the death of me,” while he
sits there perfectly calmly reading his newspaper and smoking
his pipe. So I take such reproaches for what they are.
Or else Father flies into an enormous rage, is used to
people being frightened by it and is astonished when somebody
does not give way before his anger.
-
It's easy enough to fight with an old man, etc. Because
Father is an old man, I have spared his feelings a hundred
times and tolerated things that are little short of
intolerable. Anyway, there wasn't any fighting this time
either, but just an “enough!” And because he
wouldn't listen to reason and common sense, I spoke
straight out and it can only be to the good that for once
Father should have heard a few home truths expressed that
others too think now and then.
-
That it will not be remedied in a hurry. For the sake of
appearances I have put matters straight by writing to
Father again and telling him that I have rented a studio,
that I wished him a happy New Year, and that I hoped we
would have no more quarrels of this or any other kind in
that New Year. I shall do no more about it, nor do I need
to. If this last row had been an isolated case then it
would be a different matter, but it was preceded by other
rows, yet whenever I told Father a few things in a calmer
though still resolute way, His Honour would fling it all
systematically to the winds. So as far as the things I have
said in anger are concerned, I think the same even in a
calmer mood, though for diplomatic reasons I have usually
kept quiet about them or put them differently. But this
time I lost my temper, my diplomacy went by the board, and
well, for once I had my say. I offer no apology for that
and while Father and Mother continue in this mood I shall
take nothing back. Should they later behave in a more
humane, more sensitive and more sincere way, then I shall
be happy to take everything back. But I doubt if that will
happen.
-
That Father and Mother cannot live while there is all
this bickering going on, etc., that's true, in so far as
they are creating a desert around themselves and are
earning themselves an unhappy old age when they could have
a happy and contented one. But as to such expressions as
“I cannot bear it”, “it's killing
me”, “my life is embittered”, I no longer
attach any importance to them, for that's only their little
way. And if they do not change, then, as I have already
said, I'm afraid they are storing up many bad and lonely
days for themselves.
-
That I shall be sorry, etc. Before things came to their
present pass, I used to have many regrets and be very sad
and reproach myself because things between Father and
Mother and me were going so badly. But now that matters
have gone this far, well, so be it, and to tell you the
truth, I have no regrets anymore, cannot help feeling a
sense of deliverance. If I should later come to see that I
did wrong, well, then I shall of course be sorry, but as it
is I have been unable to see how else I could possibly have
acted. When somebody tells me decisively, “Get out of
my house, the sooner the better, in half an hour rather
than an hour,” well then, my dear fellow, it doesn't
take a quarter of an hour for me to leave, never to return
either. That was going too far, and you surely understand
that, if only to spare you and others further financial
trouble, I should not lightly have left on my own accord,
but once that “Get out” has been said, by them
and not by me, well then, my course is clear enough.
-
As for Mauve - yes indeed, I am very fond of M. and am
in sympathy with him. I love his work - and I count myself
fortunate to be learning from him, but I can no more
withdraw into some system or school than Mauve can himself,
and apart from Mauve and Mauve's work, I also love others
who are quite different and work quite differently. And as
for myself and my own work, perhaps there is a similarity
between us at times, but there is certainly a difference as
well. If I love someone or something, then I do so in
earnest and sometimes with real passion and fire, but that
doesn't make me think as a matter of course that only a few
people are perfect and all the others worthless - far from
it
-
Freethinker, that is really a word I detest, although I
have to use it occasionally faute de mieux [for want of
anything better]. The fact is that I do my best to think
things through and try in my actions to take account of
reason and common sense. And trying to belittle someone
would be quite contrary to that. So it is perfectly true
that on occasion I have said to Father, “Do try to
think this or that through,” or, “To my mind,
this or that does not stand up,” but that is not
trying to belittle someone. I am not Father's enemy if I
tell him the truth for a change, not even that time I lost
my temper and did so in salty language. Only it did no
good, and Father took it amiss.
It is just that when I am in a calm
mood, I don't talk about it, although it is a different matter
when they try to force me to go to church, for instance, or to
attach importance to doing so, for then I naturally tell them
that it is completely out of the question.
(10) [sic] Does father's life count for nothing? I
have already said that when I hear someone say, “You will
be the death of me,” while in the meantime that man is
reading his paper and half a minute later is talking about
goodness knows what advertisement or other, I consider that
phrase fairly irrelevant and superfluous and take no notice of
it. As soon as that kind of phrase is repeated to others, who
are then going to consider me more or less a murderer or even a
parricide, I say, these slanders are nothing more nor less than
Jesuitisms. There you are. Anyway, the murderer has left the
house now, and so, in short, I take not the slightest notice of
any of it and even consider it ridiculous.
(11) You say, “I don't understand you.” Well, I
readily believe that, for writing is really a wretched way of
explaining things to each other. And it takes up a great deal
of time and you and I have a great deal to do as it is. But we
must have a little patience with each other until we can see,
and speak to each other.
(12) Write to me again. Yes, of course, but first we must
agree how. Would you like me to write in a kind of businesslike
style, dry and formal, weighing my words carefully and actually
saying nothing at all? Or would you like me to continue to
write as I have done recently, telling you all the thoughts
that come into my head, without being afraid of rambling on now
and then, without censoring my thoughts or holding them back?
That's what I would prefer - that is, being free to write or
say exactly what I mean.
So much for my direct answer to your letter, but I still
have some things to say to you about drawing, etc., etc., and I
would sooner talk about that. Consider it a point in my favour
that for the time being I am behaving as if Father and Mother
did not exist. It would have been much better if I had spent
this winter in Etten, and things would have been much easier
for me, too, especially for financial reasons - if I were to
start thinking and fretting about that again, it would make me
melancholy, so that's over and done with, once and for all. I
am here now and I must try to muddle through. If I wrote to
Father about it again, it would be adding fuel the fire. I
don't ever want to get angry again and am throwing myself with
might and main into life and affairs here, and, what can I do,
Etten is lost and so is Heike, but I shall try to obtain
something else in their stead.
—
Let me now thank you warmly for what you sent me, I don't
need to add that I am still extremely anxious in spite of it.
Of course my expenses are greater than in Etten and I cannot
get down to work half as energetically as I should like and
should be able to if I had greater resources.
But my studio is turning out well. I wish you could see it
sometime. I have hung up all my studies and you must send me
back those you still have because they could still be useful to
me. They may not be saleable and I readily acknowledge all
their faults, but there is something of nature in them because
they were done with some passion.
And you know, I am toiling away at watercolours right now
and when I have got my hand in, they will be saleable. But
Theo, believe me, when I went to Mauve for the first time with
my pen drawings and M. said, “Now try it with charcoal
and crayon and stump,” I had the devil of a job working
with that new material. I was patient, but that didn't seem to
help, then I grew so impatient at times that I would stamp on
my charcoal and become utterly dejected. And yet, a little
while later, I sent you drawings done with chalk and charcoal
and the brush, and I went back to Mauve with a whole lot of
similar ones, in which, naturally, he found something to
criticize, and with reason, and you did as well, it was a step
forward.
Now I am once again passing through a similar period of
struggle and dejection, of patience and impatience, of hope and
despair. But I have to struggle on and, well, in good time I
shall understand watercolours better. If it were easy, there
would be no pleasure in it. And ditto, ditto with painting.
Added to this, the weather is inclement so that I have yet
to go out just for the fun of it this winter. Still, I am
enjoying life, and in particular having a studio of my own is
too glorious for words. When are you coming to have some tea or
coffee with me? Soon, I hope. You can spend the night too, if
necessary - how very nice and how enjoyable. And I even have
some flowers too, a few small bowls of bulbs.
And what's more, I have obtained yet another ornament for my
studio. I got an amazing bargain of splendid woodcuts from the
Graphic, in part printed, not from the clichés, but from
the blocks themselves. Just what I've been looking for for
years. Drawings by Herkomer, Frank Holl, Walker and others. I
bought them from Blok the Jewish bookseller, and for five
guilders picked the best from an enormous pile of Graphics and
London News. They include some superb things, for instance, the
Houseless and Homeless by Fildes (poor people waiting outside a
night shelter) and two large Herkomers and many small ones, and
the Irish emigrants by Frank Holl and the `Old gate' by Walker,
and above all a girls' school by Frank Holl, and then another
large Herkomer, The Invalids.
Anyway, it's just the stuff I need.
And I keep such beautiful things at home with some
contentment because, my dear fellow, although I am still a long
way from doing anything as beautiful myself, I have
nevertheless hung a few of my studies of old peasants, etc., on
the wall, which proves that my enthusiasm for those artists is
not mere vanity, but that I struggle and strive to make
something myself that is realistic and yet done with
feeling.
I've got about 12 figures of diggers and people working in
the potato field, and I wonder if I couldn't do something with
them. You still have a few of them, for instance a man putting
potatoes into a sack. Well, I'm not sure when, but sooner or
later I must get down to that, because last summer I made some
careful observations, and here in the dunes I should be able to
do a good study of the earth and the sky and then put in the
figures boldly. Still, I'm not setting too much store by these
studies, and hope, of course, to do something quite different
and better, but the Brabant types are characteristic, and who
knows whether they can't still be used to good account. If
there are any you would like to keep, feel at liberty to do so,
but I should be very glad to have back those in which you are
not interested. By studying new models I will automatically
discover the mistakes in proportion I made in last summer's
studies, and so they may yet prove useful to me.
When your letter took so long to come (since it went to
Mauve first, I received it even later) I had to go to Mr.
Tersteeg, and he gave me 25 guilders until I received your
letter. It might be a good idea if I, with your knowledge, or
you, with my knowledge, made some sort of arrangement with Mr.
T. For you realize, Theo, I must know with as much certainty as
possible what to expect, and I must be able to calculate and be
able to tell in advance whether I can do this or that or must
give it up. So you will do me a great favour by agreeing with
me to a definite arrangement, and I hope you will write to me
about it soon.
Mauve has promised me to put my name forward immediately as
an associate member of Pulchri [the artists' society and
headquarters of the Hague school], because I shall then be able
to draw from the model there 2 evenings a week and shall have
more contact with artists. Then as soon as possible after that
I shall become a full member. Well, my dear fellow, thanks for
what you sent, and believe me, with a handshake,
Ever yours, Vincent
At this time, Vincent was 28 year oldSource: Theo van Gogh/Vincent van Gogh. Letter to Theo van Gogh. Written 5-8 January 1882 in The Hague. Translated by Mrs. Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, edited by Robert Harrison, number T. URL: https://www.webexhibits.org/vangogh/letter/11/169.htm.
This letter may be freely used, in accordance with the terms of this site.
|