Amice Rappard,
When I began collecting wood engravings, I was often annoyed
by the fact that I could not make out the meaning of the
monograms which many English black-and-white artists use.
Even now I don't know what all of them stand for, but at
least I am acquainted with some of them, and a list of them
will possibly be of some use to you, though perhaps you know
them all.
W S
|
Small
|
A. H.
|
Hopkins
|
|
C G
|
Charles Green
(there is also a T. Green)
|
H. H.
|
Herkomer
|
|
M E E
|
Miss Edwin Edwards
|
G P
|
?
|
|
F. B.
|
Buckmann
(you have his “London Dustyard”)
|
W. B. M.
|
Murray
|
|
F. W. L.
|
Lawson
|
F. W.
|
Walker
|
|
F. H.
|
Frank Hol
|
M W R
|
Ridley
|
|
H F
|
Henry French
|
J. G.
|
Gilbert
|
|
L. F.
|
Fildes
|
I M (M)
|
Mahoney (Household Edition Dickens - very
beautiful)
|
|
R C.
|
Caldecott
|
H F
|
Henry Furness
|
|
E J G
|
Gregory
|
S P H
|
Sidney Hall
|
|
SEW
|
Waller
|
J D W
J. B.
J. T.
|
Watson
Barnat
Tenniel
|
But often one finds these names in full
|
A. L.
|
Lançon
|
C. K.
|
Charles Keene
|
|
M
|
Morin
|
D. M.
|
du Maurier
|
|
J F
|
Jules Ferat
|
|
|
|
I am sure I've skipped some of them, but these are the ones
I remember at the moment.
In Harper's Weekly there are beautiful things by Howard
Pyle, Harper, Rogers, Abbey, Alexander and others.
I am sure you know Caton Woodville, Overend, Nash, Dodd,
Gregory, Watson, Stamland [Staniland?], Smythe, Hennessy,
Emslie from their large drawings in the Graphic and the London
News.
I also have a very nice thing by Small; this man is
amazingly clever.
I don't know whether you know Scribner's magazine and
Harper's Monthly Review; there are always very distinguished
things in them.
For the present I have only a few of them, as they are
rather expensive and one hardly ever finds secondhand
copies.
The British Workman and the Cottage and Artisan, both
penny papers of the London Tract Society, sometimes have very
tame things, but at other times, robust, beautiful things
too.
As soon as you have the time, I should like to hear more
particulars about what you have, for you are sure to have some
things that I do not possess, and I am interested in everything
relating to the subject. I should like to see the portrait of
Shakespeare by Menzel sooner or later.
Just tell me, how are your watercolours getting on?
These last few weeks I have been working hard on mine; also
types from the people.
How beautiful it is out-of-doors; sometimes I long for a
country where it is always autumn, but then we should not have
snow and apple blossoms, and no wheat and fields of
stubble.
Please check whether at any time you received from me a
large wood engraving, unsigned by the artist, representing
ladies and gentlemen on horseback in a park; I think it is the
Empress of Austria, in whose honour a hunting party or
something of the kind is being given. If you haven't got it -
although I believe you received it last summer - I have a
duplicate of it here, for I found another one recently.
Also one by Knaus - a hunter giving a piece of bread to his
dog.
Speaking of landscapes, I've always liked Birket Forster and
Read, even though they're considered old-fashioned. Among the
Reads I have an “Autumn Effect” and a
“Moonlight Scene” and a “Snow Effect,”
which are very beautiful.
English landscape painting is very divergent in conception.
Forster is very little like Edwin Edwards, but both styles have
their raison d'être. Wyllie and others with him are more
especially colourists, or rather they seek more after tone.
Particularly in Scribner's magazine and Harper's Monthly there
are very fine things rather in Wyllie's manner - little
marines, snow effects, etc., nooks of streets and gardens.
In Routledge's Sixpenny Series there is among other things
Oliver Twist, illustrated by J. Mahoney, which I
strongly recommend to you; and also the Story of a
Feather, illustrated by du Maurier; and Certain
Lectures, with drawings by Ch. Keene - but he has nicer
ones in Punch. Du Maurier is rather like Menzel,
especially in some of his large compositions.
At one time Félicien Rops and De Groux did among
other things some beautiful types in Belgium, in a magazine
called Uilenspiegel [Owlglass], which I used to have, which I
should be extremely glad to have again, but which, alas, I
can't find. There were things in it by De Groux particularly,
which were as beautiful as Israëls.
Well, old fellow, I must get back to my work; I wanted to
send you the list of monograms before I lost it again. Adieu,
write again soon, and believe me,
Ever yours, Vincent
At this time, Vincent was 29 year oldSource: Vincent van Gogh. Letter to Anthon van Rappard. Written c. 29 October 1882 in The Hague. Translated by Mrs. Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, edited by Robert Harrison, number R15. URL: https://www.webexhibits.org/vangogh/letter/11/R15.htm.
This letter may be freely used, in accordance with the terms of this site.
|