Dear Theo,
To my surprise, I received another letter from you yesterday
with a bank note enclosed. I needn't tell you how glad I was,
and I thank you heartily for it. But they refused to change the
bank note because it was too torn. However, they gave me 10
guilders on it, and it has been forwarded to Paris. If the bank
refuses it, I'll have to pay back the 10 guilders - for which I
had to sign a receipt - but if the bank changes it, I'll get
the rest later.
In your letter you write about the conflict one sometimes
has about whether one is responsible for the unfortunate
results of a good action - if it wouldn't be better to act in a
way one knows to be wrong, but which will keep one from getting
hurt - I know that conflict too. If we follow our conscience -
for me conscience is the highest reason - the reason within the
reason - we are tempted to think we have acted wrongly or
foolishly; we are especially upset when more superficial people
jeer at us, because they are so much wiser and are so much more
successful. Yes, then it is sometimes difficult, and when
circumstances occur which make the difficulties rise like a
tidal wave, one is almost sorry to be the way one is, and would
wish to have been less conscientious.
I hope you don't think of me as other than having that same
inner conflict continually, and often very tired brains too,
and in many cases not knowing how to decide questions of right
and wrong
When I am at work, I have an unlimited faith in art and the
conviction that I shall succeed; but in days of physical
prostration or when there are financial obstacles, I feel that
faith diminishing, and a doubt overwhelms me, which I try to
conquer by setting to work again at once. It's the same thing
with the woman and the children; when I am with them and the
little boy comes creeping toward me on all fours, crowing for
joy, I haven't the slightest doubt that everything is
right.
How often that child has comforted me.
When I'm home, he can't leave me alone for a moment; when
I'm at work, he pulls at my coat or climbs up against my leg
till I take him on my lap. In the studio, he crows at
everything, plays quietly with a bit of paper, a bit of string,
or an old brush; the child is always happy. If he keeps this
disposition all his life, he will be cleverer than I.
I think one may consider these thoughts partly the
consequence of overwrought nerves, and if one has them, one
must not think it one's duty to believe that things are really
as gloomy as one supposes; if one did, it would make one mad.
On the contrary, it is reasonable to one's physique then, and
later set to work like a man; and even if that doesn't help,
one must still always continue to use those two means, and
consider such melancholy fatal. Then in the long run one will
feel one's energy increase, and will bear up against the
troubles.
Mysteries remain, and sorrow or melancholy, but that eternal
negative is balanced by the positive work which is thus
achieved after all. If life were as simple, and things as
little complicated as a goody-goody's story or the hackneyed
sermon of the average clergyman, it wouldn't be so very
difficult to make one's way. But it isn't, and things are
infinitely more complicated, and right and wrong do not exist
separately, any more than black and white do in nature. One
must be careful not to fall back on opaque black - on
deliberate wrong - and even more, one has to avoid the white as
of a whitewashed wall, which means hypocrisy and everlasting
Pharisaism. He who courageously tries to follow his reason, and
especially his conscience, the very highest reason - the
sublime reason - and tries to stay honest, can hardly lose his
way entirely, I think, though he will not get off without
mistakes, rebuffs and moments of weakness, and will not achieve
perfection.
And I think it will give him a deep feeling of pity and
benevolence, broader than the narrow-mindedness which is the
clergyman's specialty.
One may not be considered of the slightest importance by
either of the parties, and one may be counted among the
mediocrities and feel like a thoroughly ordinary man among
ordinary people - for all but one will retain a rather steady
serenity in the end. One will succeed in developing one's
conscience to such a point that it becomes the voice of a
better and higher self, of which the ordinary self is the
servant. And one will not return to skepticism or cynicism, and
not belong among the foul scoffers. But not at once. I think it
a beautiful saying of Michelet's, and in those few words
Michelet expresses all I mean, “Socrate naquit un vrai
satyr, mais par le dévouement, le travail, le
renoncement des choses frivoles, il se changea si
complètement qu'au dernier jour devant ses juges et
devant sa mort il y avait en lui je ne sais quoi d'un dieu, un
rayon d'en haut dont s'illumina le Parthénon.”
[Socrates was born as a true satyr, but by devotion, work and
renouncing frivolous things he changed so completely that on
the last day before his judges and in the face of death, there
was in him something, I do not know what, of a god, a ray of
light from heaven that illuminated the Parthenon.]
One sees the same thing In Jesus too; first he was an
ordinary carpenter, but raised himself to something else,
whatever it may have been - a personality so full of pity,
love, goodness, seriousness that one is still attracted by it.
Generally, a carpenter's apprentice becomes a master carpenter,
narrow-minded, dry, miserly, vain; and whatever it may be said
of Jesus, he had another conception of things than my friend
the carpenter of the backyard, who has raised himself to the
rank of house owner, and is much vainer and has a higher
opinion of himself than Jesus had.
But I must not become too abstract. What I want to do first
is renew my strength, and I think when it has risen again from
below par, I shall get ideas from my work, for trying to
overcome that dryness.
When you come here, we shall talk it over. I don't think
it's a question of a few days.
For it is a fact that now all my work is too meager and
too dry.
Recently this has become as clear as daylight to me, and I
haven't the slightest doubt that a general thorough change is
necessary. I intend to talk over with you, after you have
seen this year's work, whether you agree with me about some
measures; and if you agree with me, I think we shall succeed in
overcoming the difficulties. We must not hesitate, but
“avoir la foi de charbonnier.”
I hope they will change the banknote. I'm so glad you have
managed to send something, for I think it saves me from
illness. I'll let you know how the story of the banknote ends.
And it would be a good thing if you could send the usual again
by the first of August. I always think that it is possible that
we shall hit on another plan for the future when looking
through the work together. I don't know what, as yet - but
somewhere there must be work which I can do just as well as
anybody else. If London were nearer, I should try there.
Know it well that I should be enormously pleased if I could
make something that was salable. In that case I should have
less scruples about the money I get from you, which after all
you need as much as I. Once more many thanks, goodbye.
Yours sincerely, Vincent
At this time, Vincent was 30 year oldSource: Vincent van Gogh. Letter to Theo van Gogh. Written 27 July 1883 in The Hague. Translated by Mrs. Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, edited by Robert Harrison, number 306. URL: https://www.webexhibits.org/vangogh/letter/12/306.htm.
This letter may be freely used, in accordance with the terms of this site.
|