Amice Rappard,
The Graphics are now in my possession. I have been looking
them over until far into the night.
I don't know whether you are acquainted with the volumes for
'70-'75 - perhaps you have them yourself among the lot you
bought. But if not, I know you will be delighted with the first
years, whenever you find an opportunity to look at them.
I hope with all my heart that you have them among your lot;
if not, I shall write about them at greater length, in
anticipation of your being able to see them yourself, as there
are so many important things among them. And at any rate you
must try your utmost to add them to your collection.
For instance, there is a series of drawings of the coal
mines by Ridley - done in a way that makes one think of the
etchings of Whistler or Seymour Haden. There are similar
drawings by Boyd Houghton, mostly about America.
Until now I never knew Boyd H[oughton] was so
interesting. There are also sketches of his from the time of
the “Commune”: pétroleuses, a barricade,
etc.
Herkomer is superb - I have now seen quite a number of large
sheets for the first time: “Old Women's Almshouse,”
“Old Men's Almshouse,” a “Cobbler,” a
“Kegelbahn” [Skittle Alley], “Orphan
Men,” “Lodginghouse,” etc.
There are also Pinwells and Fred. Walkers in those first
volumes. Also Ch. Green, Buckmann, Brentall, Small, H. Woods,
Macbeth, Gregory, all kinds of sketches of the slum districts,
etc., Frank Hol's “The Foundling” - superb
By the same, “I am the Resurrection and the
life” - superb.
By the same, “Railway Station.”
“ “ “ “Sightseeing.”
These are three sheets I have not seen for ten years.
Once again I must mention Boyd Houghton - a Shaker or Mormon
church, incredibly full of character.
Also large du Mauriers, sunny, and clear in the shadows.
Enough. You will understand that there are treasures among
them.
I am very eager to get further information about your find.
If you have the London News of the period '70-'75, I should
very much like to know the most important things in them. I
shall certainly get duplicates in consequence of my new
purchase.
I am at a loss what to do. These Graphic series are neatly
bound and in very good condition. It is almost a pity to pull
them apart. But on the other hand, being able to arrange the
sheets in such a way that the work of each artist is assembled
is also important.
Listen, old fellow - if you have these old volumes of the
Graphic among your lot, you know all about them. But if you
haven't, then you will get one of the strongest impressions
when you come here to see them.
for instance Hol's “The Foundling” and
Herkomer's “Old Women”…
But I had a melancholy feeling at the same time when I saw
H. Herkomer's words, which you passed on to me some time ago,
so clearly confirmed - namely that the later issues of the
Graphic, however beautiful occasionally, have fallen off
very, very much in general.
But those first ones!
One of the volumes of `70 is missing, but otherwise the
whole set `70 - `80 is complete, 21 volumes in all.
But I think I shall find the first volume too.
How are you getting on? Please write either a long or a
short letter soon.
And if you should still be feeling weak, and would care to
have some volumes of those first years with you, I could send
them to you.
There is something stimulating and invigorating like old
wine about those striking, powerful, virile drawings.
Adieu, with a handshake,
Ever yours, Vincent
At this time, Vincent was 29 year oldSource: Vincent van Gogh. Letter to Anthon van Rappard. Written c. 20 January 1883 in The Hague. Translated by Mrs. Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, edited by Robert Harrison, number R23. URL: https://www.webexhibits.org/vangogh/letter/12/R23.htm.
This letter may be freely used, in accordance with the terms of this site.
|