Letter 615
Saint-Rémy, c. 21 November 1889
My dear Theo,
How kind you are to me, and how I wish I could do something
good, so as to prove to you that I would like to be less
ungrateful. The paints reached me at the right moment, because
what I had brought back from Arles was almost exhausted. The
thing is that this month I have been working in the olive
groves, because their Christs in the Garden, with nothing
really observed, have gotten on my nerves. Of course with me
there is no question of doing anything from the Bible - and I
have written to Bernard and Gauguin too that I considered that
our duty is thinking, not dreaming, so that when looking at
their work I was astonished at their letting themselves go like
that. For Bernard has sent me photos of his canvases. The
trouble with them is that they are a sort of dream or nightmare
- that they are erudite enough - you can see that it is someone
who is gone on the primitives - but frankly the English
Pre-Raphaelites did it much better, and then again Puvis and
Delacroix, much more healthily than the Pre-Raphaelites.
It is not that it leaves me cold, but it gives me a painful
feeling of collapse instead of progress. Well, to shake that
off, morning and evening these bright cold days, but with a
very fine, clear sun, I have been knocking about in the
orchards, and the result is five size 30
canvases, which along with the three studies of olives that you have, at least
constitute an attack on the problem. The olive is as variable
as our willow or pollard willow in the North, you know the
willows are very striking, in spite of their seeming
monotonous, they are the trees characteristic of the country.
Now the olive and the cypress have exactly the significance
here as the willow has at home. What I have done is a rather
hard and coarse reality beside their abstractions, but it will
have a rustic quality, and will smell of the earth. I should so
like to see Gauguin's and Bernard's studies from nature, the
latter talks to me of portraits - which doubtless would please
me better.
I hope to get myself used to working in the cold - in the
morning there are very interesting effects of white frost and
fog; then I still have a great desire to do for the mountains
and cypresses what I have just done for the olives, and have a
good go at them.
The thing is that these have rarely been painted, the olive
and the cypress, and from the point of view of disposing of the
pictures, they ought to go in England. I know well
enough what they look for there. However that may be, I am
almost sure that in this way I'll do something tolerable from
time to time. It is really my opinion more and more, as I said
to Isaäcson, if you work diligently from nature
without saying to yourself beforehand - “I want to do
this or that,” if you work as if you were making a pair
of shoes, without artistic preoccupations, you will not always
do well, but the days you least expect it, you find a subject
which holds its own with the work of those who have gone
before. You learn to know a country which is basically quite
different from what it appears at first sight.
On the contrary, you say to yourself - “I want to
finish my pictures better, I want to do them with care,”
lots of ideas like that, when one is confronted by the
difficulties of weather and of changing effects, are reduced to
impracticability, and finally I resign myself and say, It is
the experience and the poor work of every day which
alone will ripen in the long run and allow one to do something
truer and more complete. So slow, long work is the only way,
and all ambition and keenness to make a good thing of it,
false. For you must spoil quite as many canvases, when you
return to the charge every morning, as you succeed with. To
paint, a regular tranquil existence would be absolutely
necessary, and at the present time, what can you do, when you
see that Bernard for instance is hurried, always hurried by his
parents? He cannot do as he wishes, and many others are in the
same fix.
Tell yourself, I will not paint any more, but then what is
one to do? Oh, we must invent a more expeditious method of
painting, less expensive than oil, and yet lasting. A
picture…that will end by becoming as commonplace as a
sermon, and a painter will be like a creature left over from
the last century. All the same, it is a pity it should be this
way. Now if the painters had understood Millet better as a man,
as some, e.g. Lhermitte and Roll, have now grasped him, things
would not be like this. We must work as much and with as few
pretensions as a peasant if we want to last.
And instead of grandiose exhibitions, it would have been
better to address oneself to the people and work so that each
one could have in his home some pictures or reproductions which
would be lessons, like the work of Millet.
. Then I am going to attack the
cypresses and the mountains. I think that this will be the core
of the work that I have done here and there in Provence, and
then we can conclude my stay here when it is convenient. It is
not urgent, for after all Paris only distracts. I don't know,
however - not always being a pessimist - I think that I still
have it in my heart someday to paint a book shop with the front
yellow and pink, in the evening, and the black passersby - it
is such an essentially modern subject. Because it seems to the
imagination such a rich source of light - say, there would be a
subject that would go well between an olive grove and a wheat
field, the sowing season of books and prints. I have a great
longing to do it like a light in the midst of darkness. Yes,
there is a way of seeing Paris beautiful. But after all, book
shops do not run away like hares, and there is no hurry, and I
am quite willing to work here for another year, which will
probably be the wisest thing to do.
Mother must have been in Leyden for a fortnight now. I have
delayed sending you the canvases for her, because I will put
them in with the picture of the “Wheat Field” for the Vingtistes.
Kindest regards to Jo, she is being very good to go on being
well. Thank you again for the paints, and the woolen waistcoat,
and a good handshake in thought.
Ever yours,
Vincent
At this time, Vincent was 36 year oldSource: Vincent van Gogh. Letter to Theo van Gogh. Written c. 21 November 1889 in Saint-Rémy. Translated by Mrs. Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, edited by Robert Harrison, number 615. URL: https://www.webexhibits.org/vangogh/letter/20/615.htm.
This letter may be freely used, in accordance with the terms of this site.
|